AUTHORITY IN PENTECOSTALISM
COMPARATIVE THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

Joseph Kenny, O.P.
[published in Tradition and compromises, Essays on the Challenge of Pentecostalism
ed. Anthony Akinwale, O.P. and Joseph Kenny, O.P.
The Michael J. Dempsey Center for Religious and Social Research, Dominican Institute, Ibadan, 2004

Pentecostalism appears to be a unique phenomenon standing apart from other religions or religious movements. At the core of Pentecostalism is a particular idea of prophecy. This essay attempts to look at prophecy as it is found in different strands of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, so as to bring to light how Pentecostalism resembles or contrasts with them.

Authority in any religion initially is prophetic. Scripture is a record of prophetic utterances and is a way of extending the time span of a prophetic event that occurred at a specific time in history. Thus Scripture becomes an authority in religion. A religion may stop with that, or there may be ongoing prophecy on the part of some leaders or among the people in general.

Ongoing prophecy among religious leaders

Prophecy confined to its scriptural record

Other religious communities revolve around a scriptural record of prophecy which becomes the sole authority, although some also have a secondary scripture representing tradition.

Ongoing prophecy among any of the faithful

Another tendency emphasises private experience of God or the "inner voice", sometimes giving it greater authority than scripture:

  • In Judaism there is Hasidism, but this seems to be purely mystical, with no charismatic, much less doctrinal dimension.
  • In Sunnism, Sufism is a way of experiencing God by mystical contact; this however does not affect doctrine. Sufism has always encountered opposition in Islam, and has been reined in and its excesses, with their doctrinal implications, have been curbed. The Sufi turuq are formed around a shaykh who can carry immense authority, like a Pentecostal pastor.
  • Pentecostalism recognizes Scripture but also the prophetic inspiration of the individual, which sometimes is given more authority than Scripture. In theory it is egalitarian, but in practice certain "anointed" individuals arrogate to themselves more authority than any pope or bishop claims in the Catholic Church. It resembles unbridled Sufism.

    Comparative observations

    The institutional prophetic role of the magisterium is the distinguishing feature of Catholicism which other Christian bodies officially reject. Yet Pentecostalism brings it in by the back door, when it exalts the pastor to an infallible oracle of the Holy Spirit for any and all matters of faith and life. On the other hand, the democratic access to the gifts of Holy Spirit, which is the hallmark of Pentecostalism is strongly present in Catholicism, but with a different emphasis.

    Among the gifts of the Holy Spirit, Catholic theology places priority on those that assist the practice of the moral and theological virtues, which are the measure of the holiness of a person. These gifts are distinguished from those which are gratis datae, for the service of the community, such as tongues, prophecy, teaching, miracles etc., which we may designate "charismatic" gifts, and have no bearing on the holiness or lack of it in a person. Pentecostals, on the other hand, while sometimes stressing "holiness", seem to give much greater prominence to the charismatic gifts, which are taken as a measure of spiritual maturity. In its baser manifestations, Pentecostalism focuses on miracles that assure health, wealth, posterity and prosperity, first of all for the pastor as an example for the others.

    Conclusion

    In facing the challenge of Pentecostalism, Catholic preaching needs to stress clearly:

  • the necessity of seeking first the kingdom of God, which consists in the life of grace, drawing nourishment from instruction and the sacraments and bearing fruit in the practice of the virtues. Then all else, the material needs which we may legitimately pray for, will be added to us.
  • the fact that grace builds upon nature and does not destroy it. This principle is built upon orthodox Christology which recognizes the two natures of Christ in one divine person. In practice, it means that human effort or hard work combines harmoniously with reliance on divine help, and neither should be stressed at the expense of the other.